Ngā Take Pūtea

E rima paihēnēti (5%) noaiho ka piki o ngā utu rēti ia tau. Hei utu mo ētahi o ngā kaupapa, utu nama, mahi haumi hoki. Kaua e māharaha, ēhara ko te katoa ka raru i tēnei pikinga. Heoi mo te roanga o ngā kōrero, pānuihia i runga i te ipurangi, ā, ka kōrero mai o whakaaro.
Finances and Rates
Tētahi ano
Submission on Representation Review.
Tairawhiti Residents Association. (TRA)
The TRA does not support the current representation proposal to increase the number of councilors to fourteen.
The TRA supports Manu Caddie’s submission to reduce the number of councilors to seven, five in the city and two rural. The TRA would like to see the ward number reduced to three (western rural, northern rural and the city) and the introduction of three new corresponding community boards.
The TRA supports this new proposal for the following reasons.
• Adding 12 to 15 community board representatives will significantly improve democracy in our region, particularly access to representatives in the rural areas. This will better address ‘effective representation’ LGC criteria.
• The initial proposal supported by GDC will result in too many councilors for effective decision making, the sensible allocation of roles and economic considerations. Guidelines recommend a maximum of 14 representatives for regional councils.
• The continual need to review ward boundaries, to compensate for the reducing number of rural residents, is becoming nonsensical. As rural boundaries encroach on the city, to make up the numbers, this is contrary to the Communities of Interest criteria.
• The introduction of community boards will create an excellent pathway for prospective councilors and provide a greater selection of experienced representatives for residents to choose from during elections. Candidates can stand for both roles at an election.
• The caliber of elected councilors will improve as competition increases for the reduced number of seats around the council table.
• The introduction of community boards will allow our unitary authority to better focus on both its district council and regional regulatory responsibilities. The current rural/urban divide at council, on many issues, is counterproductive.
• The introduction of community boards will restore the social responsibility role of representatives. With less onerous meeting hours the role of a community board member will appeal to a wider section of the community improving representation.
Background: Our understanding is that there are 78 councils in NZ and 40 that have a total of 110 community boards. There are 1600 local representatives, an average of 8.5 per council/ board. The average council has 85,000 residents, GDC has 44,000.
We wish to be heard on this submission.

Richard Thorpe
0 Rate this submission
He aha o whakaaro?
[{"id":0,"preferredOptionText":"Please select a category"},{"id":16,"preferredOptionText":"E whai ana m\u0101tau ki te whakawhanake i t\u0101 m\u0101tau whakatikatika i ng\u0101 rori katoa. T\u0113r\u0101 kia piki tem ahi haumi me ng\u0101 whakahou ki t\u0113tahi taumata e t\u014dtika ana, \u0101, ki t\u0113tahi utu e ng\u0101wari ana ki te h\u0101pori. E whakaae ana koe ki t\u0113nei k\u014dwhiringa? "},{"id":18,"preferredOptionText":"E tika ana kia whaitake nui t\u0101 m\u0101tau whakapiki i te kounga o te wai. T\u0113r\u0101 kia m\u0101 ake te wai me ng\u0101 whakam\u0101tautau i ng\u0101 hangarau tika. E ai ki t\u0113tahi rangahau i whakahaerehia i te N\u014dema e rima ng\u0101 k\u014dwhiringa i arotau koutou ki t\u0113nei w\u0101hanga: - te hauora o te tangata; - kia m\u0101 te wai mo te Kaupapa p\u0101rekarea, Kaupapa ahurea, kauhoe, ekenga ngaru, kohi m\u0101taitai; - te whakawatea wai paru i te takutai; - utu whakauru. E whakaae ana koe \u0113nei k\u014dwhiringa?"},{"id":19,"preferredOptionText":"Kei te kainoho o te kainga te tikanga o te putanga o te wai e rere atu ana i t\u014dna kainga. I roto i ng\u0101 tau e toru kua taha, i whakahaere m\u0101tau i \u0113tahi whakam\u0101tautau titiro ki t\u0113nei \u0101hutanga, titiro ko \u0113hea kei te pakaru, \u0101, me te tautoko i ng\u0101 kainoho kainga ki te whakatika. I aro nui m\u0101tau ki ng\u0101 paipa tuku waipara, putanga wai, heoi k\u0101ore tonu i eke ki t\u0101 m\u0101tau i t\u016bmanako ai. E whakaae ana koe \u0113nei k\u014dwhiringa?"},{"id":20,"preferredOptionText":"I roto i ng\u0101 tau e toru kua huri, he $750,000 te p\u016btea kua whakapau e m\u0101tau ki ng\u0101 whakapai me ng\u0101 whakahou. Heoi ia tau ia tau, e whakataha ana ng\u0101 mahi whakatikatika, i t\u0113nei kua piki te w\u0101riu o te p\u016btea whakatikatika. Ki te roa e p\u0113nei ana, ka piki te w\u0101riu, ka mate t\u0101tau ki te kati i \u0113tahi o ng\u0101 rawa nei. I roto i te mahere rautaki 2015 \u2013 2025 i whakapae m\u0101tau ka eke te wariu whakapai i te w\u0101hi nei ki te $10.5m, \u0101, e tono ana m\u0101tau ki \u0113tahi p\u016btea. I te tau 2017 e whakahaerehia e m\u0101tau t\u0113tahi rangahau p\u0101kihi, \u0101, ka kitea he nui noa atu ng\u0101 mahi haumi hei titiro m\u0101 m\u0101tau. Ko te titiro kia whakahaerehia ng\u0101 whakatikatika o t\u0113nei w\u0101hi, \u0101, kia w\u0101w\u0101hi ka \u0101ta whakahaere \u0101 taumata. Ka titiro ki te tonu p\u016btea tonu mo t\u0113nei rawa a t\u0101tau. E whakaae ana koe t\u0113nei k\u014dwhiringa"},{"id":21,"preferredOptionText":"Kua whakaritea he p\u016btea $1.85m i roto i te mahere rautaki, hei whakapiki i te haumaru o ng\u0101 ara pahikara, \u014dtira i ng\u0101 kaupapa pahirikara. Ko te haumaru o ng\u0101 ara pahikara mo ng\u0101 tamariki e haere ana ki te kura t\u0113tahi o ng\u0101 wh\u0101inga nui o t\u0113nei kaupapa. In\u0101 kua piki te kaute o ng\u0101 waka nunui e haere ana i runga i o t\u0101tau rori. I te tau 2017 i whakahaerehia he rangahau mo te hanga ara pahikara ki te t\u0101huna o te awa o Taruheru ki Te Kareti o Campion, heoi ko te kimi p\u016btea ki te utu i t\u0113nei kaupapa te mea nui. E whakaae ana koe \u0113nei k\u014dwhiringa? "},{"id":22,"preferredOptionText":"P\u0101nuihia ng\u0101 kaupapa mahere 2018 \u2013 2028, \u0101, ka k\u014drero mai o whakaaro"},{"id":23,"preferredOptionText":"E rima paih\u0113n\u0113ti (5%) noaiho ka piki o ng\u0101 utu r\u0113ti ia tau. Hei utu mo \u0113tahi o ng\u0101 kaupapa, utu nama, mahi haumi hoki. Kaua e m\u0101haraha, \u0113hara ko te katoa ka raru i t\u0113nei pikinga. Heoi mo te roanga o ng\u0101 k\u014drero, p\u0101nuihia i runga i te ipurangi, \u0101, ka k\u014drero mai o whakaaro."}]
Please select a category
  • Loading

Attach files by dropping them in here. You can also browse your computer

Your browser does not support HTML5 uploads. Please update to a newer version.

Latest Submission
Finances and Rates
Tētahi ano
Submission on Representation Review.
Tairawhiti Residents Association. (TRA)
The TRA does not support the current representation proposal to increase the number of councilors to fourteen.
The TRA supports Manu Caddie’s submission to reduce the number of councilors to seven, five in the city and two rural. The TRA would like to see the ward number reduced to three (western rural, northern rural and the city) and the introduction of three new corresponding community boards.
The TRA supports this new proposal for the following reasons.
• Adding 12 to 15 community board representatives will significantly improve democracy in our region, particularly access to representatives in the rural areas. This will better address ‘effective representation’ LGC criteria.
• The initial proposal supported by GDC will result in too many councilors for effective decision making, the sensible allocation of roles and economic considerations. Guidelines recommend a maximum of 14 representatives for regional councils.
• The continual need to review ward boundaries, to compensate for the reducing number of rural residents, is becoming nonsensical. As rural boundaries encroach on the city, to make up the numbers, this is contrary to the Communities of Interest criteria.
• The introduction of community boards will create an excellent pathway for prospective councilors and provide a greater selection of experienced representatives for residents to choose from during elections. Candidates can stand for both roles at an election.
• The caliber of elected councilors will improve as competition increases for the reduced number of seats around the council table.
• The introduction of community boards will allow our unitary authority to better focus on both its district council and regional regulatory responsibilities. The current rural/urban divide at council, on many issues, is counterproductive.
• The introduction of community boards will restore the social responsibility role of representatives. With less onerous meeting hours the role of a community board member will appeal to a wider section of the community improving representation.
Background: Our understanding is that there are 78 councils in NZ and 40 that have a total of 110 community boards. There are 1600 local representatives, an average of 8.5 per council/ board. The average council has 85,000 residents, GDC has 44,000.
We wish to be heard on this submission.

Richard Thorpe
0 Rate this submission
Akuni ka hiahia kite